Before the Nation, After the Canon: Premodern Cosmopolitanisms and Fantasy Literature in the Context of Comparative Literature


Creative Commons License

Aydın İ.

Comparative Methods Symposium: Worlds, Institutions, Disciplines , London, England, 25 June 2025, (Unpublished)

  • Publication Type: Conference Paper / Unpublished
  • City: London
  • Country: England
  • Istanbul Gelisim University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Comparative Literature has always defined itself in crisis. Since its emergence, the field has been entangled with the historical rise of the nation-state and national literatures, and each shift in global structure—political, institutional, or epistemic—has demanded new methods of comparison. Today’s disciplinary uncertainty reflects a deeper transformation: not only of institutions, but of literature itself.

 This position paper explores how fantasy literature, long excluded from canonical models of Comparative and World Literature, opens new horizons for method. Drawing on Itamar Even-Zohar’s polysystem theory and the global circulation of works by J.R.R. Tolkien and Barış Müstecaplıoğlu, I argue that fantasy’s marginality in institutional discourse masks its centrality in cultural life. Fantasy literature functions as a transnational, symbolic, and allegorical mode of storytelling that parallels premodern cosmopolitan literary systems such as the Islamic and Latin Christian traditions. These older systems, like fantasy, operated beyond national boundaries, using shared symbolic codes to structure ethical and metaphysical reflection.

 As realist narrative falters in representing an accelerating, fragmented reality, fantasy offers narrative strategies that reconnect literature to human meaning-making. In a time when literature has lost cultural primacy to digital media and AI, fantasy’s narrative ecosystems—fan cultures, imagined communities, non-institutional storytelling—offer a glimpse into new comparative horizons.

 Fantasy literature, in this sense, is not merely a genre but a methodological provocation. It challenges Comparative Literature to see the margins as productive sites of innovation. Including these "peripheral" modes of literary production not only renews the field's critical capacity, but also reconnects it with literature’s oldest function: storytelling across difference.