Numerical and Experimental Thermal–Hydraulic Performance Analysis of a Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle PCHE Recuperator


Arslan F., Güzel B.

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, cilt.46, sa.8, ss.7543-7556, 2021 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 46 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s13369-021-05464-3
  • Dergi Adı: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Communication Abstracts, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, zbMATH, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.7543-7556
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Compact heat exchanger, PCHE recuperator, Printed circuit heat exchanger, Supercritical, Thermal–hydraulic analysis, WHRS
  • İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

The supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) power cycles are mostly preferred due to their high thermal efficiency and power density in comparison with the conventional steam Rankine cycles. In this study, a printed circuit heat exchanger recuperator which is an important component in s-CO2 recuperative Brayton cycles is numerically and experimentally examined. Within this scope, thermal–hydraulic and structural analyses of a proposed PCHE have been carried out. The sub-heat exchanger model, which uses the output of a sub-heat exchanger as the input of the next one, is applied in the numerical thermal–hydraulic design by subdividing the printed circuit heat exchanger. From the results of this analysis, a heat exchanger is structurally designed and fabricated in compliance with ASME BPVC rules. The fabricated 25 kW printed circuit heat exchanger has reached to 1000 m2/m3 compactness value with 1 mm thickness of fin and 1.5 mm thickness of plate. The experiments were performed on a test bench working with supercritical carbon dioxide at high pressures. The results of the experimental and numerical analyses are in good agreement. The maximum difference between the heat loads and the effectiveness values is 4.9% and 5.4%, respectively. The difference between the overall heat transfer coefficients is 1.2%. It is shown that using the sub-heat exchanger model provides highly accurate printed circuit heat exchanger designs.