From Formal References to Architectural Form and Meaning: A Transformation-Based Framework for Analysing Reference-Driven Design
BUILDINGS (BASEL), cilt.16, sa.16, ss.1-39, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 16
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/buildings16163139
- Dergi Adı: BUILDINGS (BASEL)
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Applied Science & Technology Source, Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Scopus, Materials Science & Engineering Collection (ProQuest), Technology Collection (ProQuest), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Avery, Compendex, INSPEC, Directory of Open Access Journals
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-39
- İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
This study investigates how formal references are transformed into architectural form and meaning. While previous studies have acknowledged the diversity of source domains in architecture, they often remain fragmented and lack a systematic framework that explains how such references are operated upon during design. This gap limits the ability to dis‑ tinguish between the literal replication of recognizable forms and the deeper transforma‑ tion of their conceptual, structural, and symbolic properties. In response, this research develops a Transformation‑Based Formal Reference Framework (TFRF) that traces formal reference through six stages—source, interpretation, abstraction, transformation, architec‑ tural expression, and meaning production—with a feedback loop from received meaning back to interpretation. The contribution is therefore not a new classification of sources; classification by source domain (living organisms, cosmos and geographical formations, language, belief systems, precedent architecture, and human‑made products) is retained only as the entry point of the process. Thirty‑one architectural cases, selected through pur‑ posive sampling and independently double‑coded (κ = 0.75 for abstraction and κ = 0.86 for transfer), are positioned within a two‑dimensional matrix that crosses degree of abstraction (direct, analogy, abstraction) with type of transfer (form, structure, performance, symbol, space). The analysis suggests that source domain and transformation mechanism function as analytically distinct dimensions: one source can yield opposite mechanisms and distant sources can converge on the same one. The framework thereby reframes formal reference from a catalogue of inspirations into a navigable two‑axis design space, offering a trans‑ ferable analytical framework for understanding how architectural references become form and meaning.