II. Uluslararası Siyaset, Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Kongresi, Sinop, Türkiye, 2 - 03 Aralık 2025, (Özet Bildiri)
The connection
between Syria and Lebanon grew strong as Lebanon’s war dragged on from 1975 to
1990. Once the Taif agreement kicked in after '89, Syria stepped into the
spotlight - shaping decisions behind major political and security setups. From 1990
until 2005, Damascus steered Beirut’s moves through covert ops, quiet pressure,
alongside relationships with powerful Lebanese individuals. Even after Syrian
troops left, sway from Damascus stuck around through alliances with local
groups and political wings. To understand the shifts since then, picture
foreign interference slowly weakening local authority while unrest stays
beneath. The aim here is to examine Syria’s influence on Lebanon’s governance
and decisions from 1975 through 2020. It highlights how Damascus’s lasting
presence and calculated alliances shaped Beirut’s policy moves, internal
responses, along with handling an increase of violence sparked by selective
assassinations. Beyond that, it explores how this control evolved after Syrian
troops left in 2005 - the year Hariri died - shifting gradually from direct
control toward other tools such as financial pressure and quiet backdoor
influence. It uses already available material from UN reports to BBC writers’
pieces, memoirs such as love and death in Beirut, personal stories by people
who survived the civil war, decisions by international courts, and academic
studies on Syria-Lebanon relations. It also draws meaning from government
speeches and official documents. The thinking behind this study combines
concepts about national dependence, outside interference, and how politics
rebuilds after conflict ends. Findings show Lebanon can move toward change and
independence only by ending outside interference, building stronger systems,
then redefining relations with Syria via transparency, equity, and mutual
respect.
Keywords: Lebanon,
Syria, Political Influence, Governance, Decision Making